Showing posts with label reading. Show all posts
Showing posts with label reading. Show all posts

Friday, September 17, 2010

This Madcap Existence We Call Life


How do you quantify the unquantifiable, and reduce the unexplainable to a rational equation?

Martha Beck is Harvard-educated, brilliant, and married to an equally Harvard- educated and brilliant man. At the outset Expecting Adam, neither Martha nor her husband are religious, although both were raised as Mormons. They had agreed that "it was a very good idea to abort fetuses with birth defects." But when Martha becomes pregnant with a Down's Syndrome baby, whom she names Adam, she's not so sure about things. It doesn't help that her entire world has been turned upside-down with inexplicable events and miracles large and small since Adam's conception.

Precisely because Beck refuses to be pigeon-holed by either right or left, Expecting Adam continually turned me on my head while I was reading it. Beck can write (when describing her complete lethargy and weakness at one point in time, she compares herself to "Popeye during the Great Spinach Shortage"). Simple statement. I enjoy, I tremendously enjoy, reading the work of people who can write. Beck is witty, sharp, and sarcastic. When she experiences any negative or shallow reaction to Adam's existence in this world, she roars with all of the fury of a mother bear. Yet she makes it abundantly clear that it is Adam who has taught her what life really consists in: the ability to slow down and enjoy the world, not to be caught up in what society classifies as the necessities of life, to truly appreciate the wonder of this mad existence that we lead.

Beck writes quite frankly about Adam's existence as a person before his birth. Neither she nor her husband deny the humanity of the unborn. This, coupled with all of the incredible things that happen to her during her pregnancy beg the question -- why hadn't she become "pro-life" by the time of Adam's birth? She admits that she's come to believe in the existence of the spiritual realm (it's hard not to when someone pushes you out of a burning building and a picture shows absolutely no one behind you), whether it's God, angels, cosmic puppeteers or invisible gremlins. She does offer the explanation that "I myself had suspended my disbelief in a spiritual realm and was stumbling daily over more and more evidence that my world was full of things rationalist science could not explain. But this made me feel better, not worse, about the fate of those who die young, including those who die as fetuses. Why should people who believe that life exists outside of mortal bounds be the very same people who are so obsessed with a fetus's 'right to life' on this messy little planet?"

It is because Beck remains an "outsider" of the pro-life movement, that her memoir resonated with me in a way that similar stories, told by wonderful and fervent pro-lifers, have not. I am not accusing these people of propaganda (on the contrary, I agree with them on nearly every count), but because Beck remains as mystified at the end as at the beginning of her story as to why exactly she kept Adam in the first place, her words carry a raw honesty that is often lost in the charged rhetoric of the abortion/pro-life debate.

Beck's story provided me with much fodder for thought, but ultimately the lessons she learned from Adam touched me the most deeply. One thing that I've come to learn over this past summer is the importance of appreciating the wonder of life, and all the beauty and miraculousness that God has placed here for us. Beck does not hesitate to admit that her own obsession with achievements and the perfect life were entirely upended by Adam.

"I was afraid Adam would slow me down, and he has. Not because he has required more care and time than a "normal boy" (he is the most helpful and least demanding of my children) but because the immediacy and joy with which he lives his life make rapacious achievement, Harvard-style, look a lot like quiet desperation. Adam has slowed me down to the point where I notice what is in front of me, its mystery and beauty, instead of thrashing my way through a maze of difficult requirements toward labels and achievements that contain no joy in themselves. Adam takes his joy straight up, in purer form than most of us can handle. He was the person who, at two years of age, spent enough time experimenting to learn that his four-month-old sister was capable of laughter, and determining exactly what would make her laugh. He is the one who goes into transports of delight over clean sheets, or packaged waffles, or batteries. He is the one who taught me to appreciate rainbows -- not only in the sky but also in lawn sprinklers and dish-soap bubbles and patches of oil. He is the one who stops, and makes me stop, to smell the bushes."

(caveat emptor: Beck is extremely frank about her views on abortion and contraception, almost to point of rubbing the reader's face in them. She also swears on occasion, but I found it to be understandable, if not excusable. There are also some slightly, but not horrifically, graphic descriptions of various medical complications from her pregnancy.)

Saturday, February 20, 2010

Lord Peter Wimsey

Last semester, I had the beautiful luck of discovering the perfectly delightful Lord Peter Wimsey. Dorothy Sayers' detective novels have been on my to-read list for eons, but somehow I never got around to reading them. Until now.

Since I couldn't find Whose Body?, the first in the series, I got a book of short stories to peruse. Because of all that curricular reading, I wanted something that I could read in short bursts whenever I found a few smidgens of free time, or simply couldn't bear the thought of another reading from Aristotle's Categories (no matter how beautifully logical you are, Aristotle, you can be rather dry and dull from time to time).

And Lord Peter is simply the most wonderful non-existent person I have had the very great pleasure of meeting in a very long time (enough superlatives for you?). He reminds me a little of P. G. Wodehouse's Bertie Wooster, but with a rather larger endowment of mental acumen. He even has an amazing butler sidekick who is the very model of discretion and loyalty. (For those of you who have not made the acquaintance of Bertie and his inimitable valet, Jeeves, I can but offer my most sincere sympathy. You have not lived.)

As well as the comic genius of Wooster and Jeeves, Wimsey also brought G. K. Chesterton's crime-solving priest Fr. Brown to mind as well. In The Blue Cross, Fr. Brown's child-like simplicity and world-view cloak an astounding understanding of the way in which the human mind and soul work. As Fr. Brown simply remarks, however, "Has it never struck you that a man who does next to nothing but hear men's real sins is not likely to be wholly unaware of human evil?"

Wimsey often wears the same kind of abstracted expression on his face that Fr. Brown wears. In The Vindictive Story of the Footsteps That Ran, Wimsey has seen something that has to do with the mystery, but he cannot for the life of him recall what it was. Eventually he puzzles his way through it, an extraordinary mix of abstraction and brilliance.

Lord Peter has often been criticized as being "too perfect". He does have flaws (a fear of responsibility, shell-shock), but they are few, and his list of skills and talents grows as the stories go on. In some ways, Lord Peter does come across as a shallow character, made to meet the requirements of the story at hand without the depth that would be expected of a character in a full-length novel (true, these stories aren't full-length; nevertheless, Lord Peter's character is unusually thin in some stories, even for a genre where character development takes a back seat to plot.) In "The Adventurous Exploit of the Cave of Ali Baba" , Lord Peter tackles the requisite secret ring of thieves in the necessary melodramatic fashion. A few of the other stories are equally spectacular, but equally enjoyable as well.

It is only when Lord Peter interacts with the various members of his family (nephew, wife, sons) that he seems more authentic. In most stories, Lord Peter is the detective extraordinaire, aided quite capably by his man, Bunter, but still intangible. With his family, Lord Peter is allowed to show more than his merely professional attitudes and abilities. Indeed, in Talboys, the last of the stories, Sayers paints a delightfully full-bodied picture of Lord Peter with his wife and sons, solving a mystery and fending off an over-zealous would-be child-rearing expert at one and the same time. Talboys sealed my fate as a Wimsey fangirl. While reading it, I caught distinct echoes of the often-chaotic events that accompany a family of any size, including my own. Perhaps because this is the scenario with which I am most familiar, Talboys seemed to me the most real of these tales. However exciting and glamorous Lord Peter's previous life as a detective was, the truest adventures are those which take place in the harum-scarum reality of family life.

Wednesday, January 27, 2010

For the Bookworms

As most of us are here avid bookworms, I thought that I'd share these free bookplates that I found via wide open spaces (a lovely blog, by the way). What better way to proclaim your ownership of the best that literature has to offer?

From Martha Stewart:



From Blah Blah Blahg:


More bookplates can be found here.

Tuesday, December 1, 2009

Warning: Finals Approaching

A short apology for not posting more frequently: I've been sick, there's always a load of homework, and no internet access over Thanksgiving being just a few of my excuses. And, with finals swiftly approaching in a week and a half, I probably won't be back to posting until I'm home over Christmas break.

That being said, I do have two projects in the works: a review of Pan's Labyrinth and my thoughts on Lord Peter Wimsey (preview: I love him!). They may even get posted earlier if I'm feeling rebellious and don't want to study my Harvey. I may even throw in my thoughts on The Barber of Seville (I'm going to see it on Sunday). You have been warned.

Thursday, November 12, 2009

Emma


"If I loved you less, I might be able to talk about it more." ---Mr. Knightley

There is a new Mr. Darcy in town, girls, and his name is George Knightley.

After re-reading Pride and Prejudice in March (see previous posts about character research), I had the brilliant idea to re-read all the Jane Austen novels. Things went along swimmingly until I hit Emma.

I've been reading (or rather: not-reading)Emma since May.

I'm not kidding.

Let's not judge, shall we?

Anyhow, I finished it last night, and I have to admit-it's probably now one of my favorite Jane Austens! Although, come to think of it, the only Jane Austen that I've re-read that I haven't fallen head over heels in love with is:
*whispers*

Northanger Abbey.

Please don't kill me, Cecilia!

*hides*

Anyhow. Emma. One of my favorite lines is this:

"It darted through her with the speed of an arrow that Mr. Knightley must marry no one but herself!"

The slow growth of her love, and then it's sudden realization is so truthful, beautiful and touching. It reminds me of my favorite Pride and Prejudice quote:
"I was in the middle before I knew I had begun."--Darcy. Love comes softly, as my sister would say. Mr. Knightley tells Emma, "I could not think about you so much without doating on you, faults and all; and by dint of fancying so many errors, have been in love with you ever since you were thirteen at least." C.S. Lewis would say that love, like Heaven, works backwards. It shines a new, clear light on all our past thoughts, emotions, and actions. Love sneaks up on Emma-she has been distracting herself and in total oblivion, completely ignoring it. But, then, she realizes in a heartbeat that she's been disregarding what she should have embraced.

It's a beautiful love story-I definitely recommend reading it, or re-reading it soon!

And hopefully, it won't take you 6 months.