Showing posts with label food for thought. Show all posts
Showing posts with label food for thought. Show all posts

Tuesday, February 14, 2012

Love in a Modern World

First off, a refreshing defense of true love in a shallow, cynical culture by Fr. Longenecker.

Followed by a thought-provoking project, wherein Italian artist Anna Utopia Giordano photoshops classic nude paintings, nipping the waistline and, ahem, augmenting the bust. More than a little depressing, no? Honestly, it surprised me how wrong the thinner versions looked, practically emaciated. So much for the modern standards of beauty.

Wednesday, October 19, 2011

Social Networking

Humans are social creatures, and women in particular are fond of conversation and an all-encompassing exchange of information -- who's dating whom, who's broken up with, what they wore and why they did it. We just like to know what's going on in the lives of the people around us. I've just been wondering lately -- when does a normal conversation about what other people are doing and thinking cross the line and become gossip?

There is an obvious divide between talking about the latest social event and a no-holds-barred catfest, but what about the gray areas in between? When do you cross the line between honest discussion and gossiping? It's easy enough to give some universal principle, but the practical application is a far more slippery beast. Thoughts?

Wednesday, January 12, 2011

Expect the Best

An interesting article in the Wall Street Journal comparing the parenting approaches between "Asian parents" and "Western parents". The author lays out a basic difference in the two views, namely that Asian parents expect the best and get it and that Western parents reinforce the idea that their children will be loved and accepted whether they succeed or fail, and then proceeds to champion the "Asian" approach. It's an unusual take, not least of all for the fact that it acknowledges, stereotypes aside, that there are two different cultures here, and they do have a crucial difference between them. I'm not actually sure what I think about it: I can see a certain appeal to refusing to accept failure as an option -- a you-can-and-will-do-it attitude that inspires the child to succeed -- and then ingraining that view; it certainly seems to have worked more than once in the past. But at one and the same time I think that it must be acknowledged that not everyone is cut out to be a chess master or a violin maestro, and refusing to accept this possibility could be devastating for that less-than-perfect child.

"A lot of people wonder how Chinese parents raise such stereotypically successful kids. They wonder what these parents do to produce so many math whizzes and music prodigies, what it's like inside the family, and whether they could do it too. Well, I can tell them, because I've done it. Here are some things my daughters, Sophia and Louisa, were never allowed to do:

• attend a sleepover

• have a playdate

• be in a school play

• complain about not being in a school play

• watch TV or play computer games

• choose their own extracurricular activities

• get any grade less than an A

• not be the No. 1 student in every subject except gym and drama

• play any instrument other than the piano or violin

• not play the piano or violin.

[...]

All the same, even when Western parents think they're being strict, they usually don't come close to being Chinese mothers. For example, my Western friends who consider themselves strict make their children practice their instruments 30 minutes every day. An hour at most. For a Chinese mother, the first hour is the easy part. It's hours two and three that get tough."


Read the rest here.